Available for board membership, advisory councils, and oversight roles where clarity, ethics, and cross-disciplinary fluency are required.
Sophy Laughing brings institutional trust, global experience, and independent judgment. With a background in critical infrastructure, defense, cross-border negotiation, and regulatory oversight, she serves boards that value both practical execution and principled conduct.
Use Case: Infrastructure funds, public boards, ethics committees, cultural institutions.
Boards don’t need another slide deck. They need a narrative they can act on—a scenario map, a risk logic, a strategic frame to make decisions that will hold under scrutiny.
Use Case: Confidential strategic memos, scripts, or facilitated sessions designed to support board-level action under uncertainty. These are crafted quietly, and tailored specifically to the internal questions your leadership is wrestling with: political shifts, ESG exposure, operational risk, labor volatility, or regulatory pressure.
You don’t need more ideas. You need sharper decisions.
We help leaders design decision frameworks that match the scale and gravity of their responsibilities. Whether it’s a regulatory choke point, a multi-party contract dispute, or a scenario no one's prepared for—our job is to help you make the call before circumstances make it for you.
This isn’t about analysis paralysis. It’s about aligning your board, general counsel, and operational teams around a shared understanding of the stakes, trade-offs, and downstream impact. We’ve done this in defense, energy, government partnerships, and emergency response—all while protecting institutional credibility.
Use Case: High-stakes decision modeling for cross-border deals, post-breach remediation, federal inquiries, or complex asset transfers.
Strategy gets real when there’s disagreement.
We don’t defuse tension—we mine it. Because that’s where the real clarity lives. We facilitate strategic conflict resolution in environments where consensus isn’t the goal—alignment is. Our method works because it blends contract intelligence, organizational psychology, and political fluency.
Whether it’s navigating union tension on a federal jobsite, smoothing friction between agency heads, or resolving board-level divergence over ESG exposure, we help you get from dysfunction to traction—without PR casualties.
Use Case: Internal or external conflict posing strategic risk to project delivery, brand trust, or governance credibility.
Most risk reports are performative. Ours are catalytic.
We craft board-level scenario maps—not “what-if” hypotheticals, but strategic pathways that challenge blind spots and expand decision space. These aren’t decks. They’re documents your general counsel and CFO will actually annotate. We build them from the ground up using input from internal audits, operational teams, legal advisors, and frontline staff—then layer in market volatility, geopolitical variables, and social perception risk.
If you’re preparing to invest, divest, restructure, or launch amid pressure—we help you see around corners.
Use Case: Quarterly risk refresh for infrastructure funds, pre-close diligence for defense acquisitions, or narrative scaffolding for public-facing governance decisions.
For C-suite executives (CEOs, COOs, GCs), senior operations leads, government contractors, or defense/infra leaders and organizations operating under pressure—regulatory, reputational, or geopolitical—this suite of deliverables is designed to provide senior leadership with clear, actionable insight fast. This is not a strategy workshop. It’s decision support for leaders facing uncertainty, complexity, or institutional resistance.
A 3–5 page high-level memo that frames a pending or recurring decision: options, risks, second- and third-order consequences, likely stakeholder reactions, and recommended action. This is what gets read before a $100M call. Drafted to be forwardable, quotable, and defensible.
Use Case: Fast response-tools for operators dealing with real-time uncertainty or high-stakes decision modeling for cross-border deals, post-breach remediation, federal inquiries, or complex asset transfers.
When a board member, COO, or general counsel needs to articulate a position—without writing it themselves. Includes interviews, synthesis of past materials, and strategic voice alignment. Often paired with decks or talking points.
Use Case: Fast response-tools for strategic voice alignment for public statements, board prep, congressional briefings, or sensitive policy positions.
A facilitated 2-hour tabletop session with key leadership to walk through strategic contingencies. Includes briefing materials, red-team prompts, escalation points, and recovery plans. Used to prepare for funding gaps, regulatory escalation, project disruption, or institutional conflict.
Use Case: Fast response-tools for contingency planning for regulatory escalation, funding gaps, contract disruption, or reputational risk events.
For institutional boards, advisory councils, ethics committees, or investment funds navigating instability—this suite is built to provide quiet, clear, high-trust support. This is not lobbying, public affairs, or external strategy. It’s governance-grounded decision guidance.
A 3–4 page confidential memo that outlines the current threat landscape: political instability, ESG exposure, labor volatility, or regulatory shifts. Frames the context, provides calibrated scenarios, and offers a position or response the board can stand behind.
Use Case: Quiet alignment before a board vote, navigating investor pressure, or crafting a defensible position for the minutes.
Quarterly or situational briefing for boards and oversight committees. Synthesizes developments across legal, political, regulatory, labor, and reputational domains. Includes early warning signals, timeline risks, and key questions to surface at the next board session.
Use Case: Institutional oversight when the situation is moving too fast for internal teams to track or flag the real exposure.
A confidential 90-minute facilitation session to get board members aligned on how to move through a reputational or regulatory threat. No slides. Just scenario parsing, stakeholder mapping, and response triage.
Use Case: Immediate alignment when there’s board-level disagreement on how to handle a political, ESG, or legal escalation.
Note: Market values are estimates. Pricing varies based on required research depth, document sensitivity, and urgency of delivery.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.